»the analysis deftly bringing together a lot of the scholarly debates on the actual application of the relevant rules post-2001, and especially following the delivery of the 2007 International Court of Justice (ICJ) Genocide judgment... Going beyond the traditional reading of the provision in relation to the exercise of police powers etc., Dereje makes a number of interesting remarks... the author should be commended for re-visiting the rules of attribution as regards state enterprises in the light of case law appearing following the adoption of the ARSIWA in 2001, and for attempting to synthesize such case law into a legible catalogue of criteria applying across the board of international law.«
Dr. Markos Karavias, Journal of World Investment & Trade, 2018 329-334

»... a minute, solid analysis of the bases for attribution under Articles 4, 5, 7,8 ARSIWA. Dereje is obviously in his comfort zone here, the analysis deftly bringing together a lot of the scholarly debates on the actual application of the relevant rules post-2001, and especially following the delivery of the 2007 International Court of Justice (ICJ) Genocide judgment. Going beyond the traditional reading of the provision in relation to the exercise of police powers etc., Dereje makes a number of interesting remarks. [T]he author should be commended for re-visiting the rules of attribution as regards state enterprises in the light of case law appearing following the adoption of the ARSIWA in 2001, and for attempting to synthesize such case law into a legible catalogue of criteria applying across the board of international law.«
Markos Karavias, JWIT 2/2018