Refresh

0 Hits

Portocarrero Quispe

Der autoritative Charakter der Grundrechtsabwägung

Eine Untersuchung über die Rolle der formellen Prinzipien in der Grundrechtsinterpretation
Nomos,  2014, 280 Pages

ISBN 978-3-8487-1523-7


Our continuation service: You will receive new series titles or new editions automatically and without obligation to purchase. If you wish to do so, you can mark it in the shopping cart.

The work is part of the series Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie (Volume 62)
79,00 € incl. VAT
Also available as eBook
79,00 € incl. VAT
Available
Add to shopping cart
Add to notepad
 Further options for registered users

englischThe relationship between decision-making competences of the legislator and the supervisory power of the constitutional jurisdiction is one of the most controversial fields in law theory. During the last thirty years the theory of principles aimed to solve this problem. Nevertheless copious objections have been raised against this pursue. One of these objections claims that the theory of principles presents a threat for the authority of the legislator in favour of the constitutional judge and that the balancing analysis, which is central for the theory of principles, is an irrational and subjective procedure that also weakens the rule of law in favour of a judicial activism.

Does the democratic state under the rule of law really face a threat due to the theory of principles and the balancing of constitutional rights?

The book aims to develop an answer to this question by analyzing the rationality of the balancing procedure as well as the role of the formal principles in the structure of the balancing.