Autonomie versus Akzessorietät des Strafrechts am Beispiel des ärztlichen Abrechnungsbetruges

In the field of accounting fraud by physicians jurisdiction uses the interpretation of § 263 StGB which depends on the rules of social law (SGB V) and the law of accounting charges (GOÄ). By reference to the objective elements “Täuschung” and “Vermögensschaden” the thesis investigates the legitimacy of this method and scrutinizes, whether the interpretation of § 263 StGB should only take place by the criminal law in this domain.
For that the author uses the principle of asymmetrical accessoriness and the constitutionally guaranteed principle of determination as the central points of his review.