Pay-for-Delay-Vereinbarungen im transatlantischen Vergleich
Die kartellrechtliche Beurteilung von Patent-Vergleichsvereinbarungen in der Pharmabranche anhand von Art. 101 AEUV und Sec. 1 Sherman Act
Nomos, 1. Edition 2018, 356 Pages
The product is part of the series
Wirtschaftsrecht und Wirtschaftspolitik
Description
Due to patent protection of an original product, original and generic manufacturers are frequently in dispute about the time a generic product should enter the market. To resolve this issue, companies reach patent settlements, including a value transfer from the original manufacturer to the generic company. In return, the generic manufacturer ensures that the launch of the product in question is delayed. These settlements are called pay-for-delay settlements.
This thesis investigates the compatibility of such patent settlements with European antitrust law. Its starting point is the USA's legal system, which has a much longer history than that of the EU. The first European Commission decision only dates back to 2013, so this short period of time has left essential questions unresolved. Thus, there is no clear distinction between a legitimate settlement and an anticompetitive pay-for-delay settlement.
This thesis investigates the compatibility of such patent settlements with European antitrust law. Its starting point is the USA's legal system, which has a much longer history than that of the EU. The first European Commission decision only dates back to 2013, so this short period of time has left essential questions unresolved. Thus, there is no clear distinction between a legitimate settlement and an anticompetitive pay-for-delay settlement.
Bibliographical data
Edition | 1 |
---|---|
ISBN | 978-3-8487-4759-7 |
Subtitle | Die kartellrechtliche Beurteilung von Patent-Vergleichsvereinbarungen in der Pharmabranche anhand von Art. 101 AEUV und Sec. 1 Sherman Act |
Publication Date | Jan 30, 2018 |
Year of Publication | 2018 |
Publisher | Nomos |
Format | Softcover |
Language | deutsch |
Pages | 356 |
Medium | Book |
Product Type | Scientific literature |
Reviews
»Ohnehin stellt die Dissertation von Langguth einen wichtigen Beitrag sowohl für die Wissenschaft, aber auch (gerade) für die Praxis dar. Das Werk bietet dem Praktiker eine wichtige Grundlage für die Entscheidung, ob und wie eine Pay-for-Delay-Vereinbarung kartellrechtskonform durchgeführt werden kann. Bei ihren Wertungen bezieht Langguth ausführlich, deutlich und nachvollziehbar Position. Die Dissertation bereichert die Diskussion um das Verhältnis zwischen Immaterialgüter- und Kartellrecht und ist damit ein Gewinn für jede wettbewerbsrechtliche Bibliothek.«
Dr. iur. Alexander Eufinger, GRUR Int. 2018, 1226-1227
Dr. iur. Alexander Eufinger, GRUR Int. 2018, 1226-1227
Product safety information
Manufacturer of products offered under GPSR
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
Waldseestraße 3 - 5
76530 Baden-Baden, Germany
service@nomos.de
www.nomos.de