Die Systematisierung von Rechtfertigungsgründen im preisbezogenen Behinderungsmissbrauch nach Art. 102 AEUV

Low-price strategies of undertakings with a dominant market position are often subject to an inadequate abuse-analysis evaluation for the individual case. Thus, a systematic integration of grounds of justification in the examination according to Art. 102 TFEU seems overdue. In an interdisciplinary discourse, after a brief dogmatic classification, efficiency- and competition-specific anchor points are explored, which basically allow individual grounds of justification to be categorized according to application. This is followed by a differentiation in structure and content. The integration of reliable economic knowledge is of particular importance.